-
Policy Letter: SANDAG - Minimize Delay Connecting Transit To San Diego Airport
SANDAG’s February 23, 2024 Board meeting was scheduled to include an update from staff on the status of plans for Transit to the Airport. Like many San Diegans, Circulate expected to see a plan and alternatives submitted for environmental review soon. We were therefore disappointed to instead see this item suggest re-analyzing the project and, more concerningly, projecting a 24-month timeline for doing so.
Circulate recognizes the possible need to ensure confidence in this project, both among the SANDAG Board and the public. However, the 24-month timeline for SANDAG’s proposed re-analysis is, on its face, exceptional. Circulate submitted a letter asking that SANDAG revisit that timeline and shorten it as aggressively as it can.
COVERAGE:
San Diego airport transit system: Update, Axios San Diego, February 21, 2024
Long-studied transit connection to San Diego airport still more than three years off, The San Diego Union Tribune, February 23, 2024
-
Letter: Support Airport Authority Connecting Transit To San Diego Airport
Circulate submitted a letter to the San Diego Regional Airport Authority encouraging connection of the existing MTS Trolley and Train system to the San Diego International Airport. Service must be frequent, luggage friendly and useful for both flyers and airport employees. Rapid implementation is important, meaning the Airport Authority and SANDAG should prefer options that match to feasible funding opportunities, and independent of larger proposed future projects that might not happen.
-
Letter: Support Connecting Transit To San Diego Airport
Circulate submitted a letter to SANDAG encouraging connection of the existing MTS Trolley and Train system to the San Diego International Airport. Service must be frequent, luggage friendly and useful for both flyers and airport employees. Rapid implementation is important, meaning SANDAG should prefer options that match to feasible funding opportunities, and independent of larger proposed future projects that might not happen.
-
Letter: Development of Revenue Constrained Network Scenarios and Network Performance Measures
Circulate San Diego wrote a letter to the SANDAG Board of Directors regarding the development of the 2019 Regional Plan revenue-constrained network scenarios. Circulate recommends the development of a revenue-constrained transit-advancing network scenario and Network Performance Measures that include an analysis of compliance with adopted Climate Action Plans across the region.
Read the letter here [PDF].
-
White Paper: Anatomy of Ballot Measure – Analysis of the Transit Elements in SANDAG’s Proposed 2016 Ballot Measure Expenditure Plans
Today, Circulate San Diego is releasing a white paper analyzing the evolution of the transit and active transportation components of SANDAG's potential 2016 ballot measure.
This analysis was generated initially for internal purposes by Circulate San Diego staff and volunteers. The purpose of this memorandum is not for Circulate San Diego to speak in favor or against any ballot funding scenario. Instead, by publishing this information, it is our hope this analysis will help inform decisionmakers, advocates, the public, and the press. We aim to help develop a more broad understanding of SANDAG’s processes, priorities, and constraints.
Released with this document is an electronic appendix, which compares each of the various ballot expenditure plans side by side. Circulate San Diego also calculated the expected service dates for the various transit projects in each expenditure plan, based on the data SANDAG released.
-
Why transit advocates may not support a Quality of Life measure in 2016.
Part 5 of our series discusses why transit advocates may not support a Quality of Life measure in 2016.As we begin, we should remind readers that Circulate San Diego is predisposed to support a Quality of Life measure. SANDAG is likely to include substantial funding in such a measure for transit operations, and may also fund bicycling and pedestrian infrastructure.
However, transit advocates including Circulate San Diego, may not support a 2016 measure if it does not have the effect of advancing transit and active transportation projects earlier than is contemplated by SANDAG’s recently-adopted Regional Plan. Advocates like Circulate San Diego opposed the 2015 Regional Plan. If the Quality of Life measure merely funds that plan, as-is, then it would not make much sense for transit advocates to support it. As discussed in the prior post, a Quality of Life measure has the ability to advance transit projects. So that means that advocates have a very reasonable case to require Quality of Life to advance transit, and would be wise to say “no” to Quality of Life if transit were not advanced.
Read more -
Quality of Life: How a Quality of Life measure can advance transit and active transportation projects
This is Part 4 of a series on a potential 2016 Quality of Life measure.As discussed in the prior post, advocates for transit want any Quality of Life measure to advance the construction of transit and active transportation projects into periods earlier than are contemplated by SANDAG’s 2015 Regional Plan.
For many transit advocates, the primary objection to SANDAG’s regional planning efforts is the timeline in which transit and active transportation projects are scheduled to come online. They do not object to the transit projects planned, only the long wait to see them completed.
If the region adopts a Quality of Life measure, there are a variety of ways in which it might accelerate transit construction. This post reviews some of the options.
Read more -
Quality of Life: What to expect in a Quality of Life measure – Part B
This is Part 3 of a series of blog posts from Circulate San Diego about a potential 2016 Quality of Life measure.The prior post covered a variety of likely uses from a region-wide Quality of Life measure. This post will review a number of other potential uses.
Read more -
Quality of Life: What to expect in a Quality of Life measure – Part A
This is Part 2 of a series of blog posts from Circulate San Diego about a potential 2016 Quality of Life measure.It will be some time before SANDAG decides whether and how to move forward with a Quality of Life measure in 2016. However, there are some useful clues that can help advocates and the public understand what elements SANDAG is likely to include in a region-wide measure.
A Quality of Life measure is likely to generate approximately $26 billion over 40 years. SANDAG assumes in their 2015 regional plan that voters will approve a quarter cent sales tax, over 30 years, which would generate $10 billion. As explained below, SANDAG plans to spend that $10 billion on transit operations. However, SANDAG’s public board discussions and their recent polling have contemplated a half-cent sales tax over a 40-year period. Combined, that will mean a total of $26 billion raised over 40 years, and $16 billion in projects SANDAG can fund, above and beyond what their current Regional Plan already includes.
The below discussion outlines a variety of uses SANDAG may have for Quality of Life revenue. While estimated figures for each use are listed where available, the ultimate mix of projects and programs have not yet been finalized by the SANDAG board.
Read more -
Quality of Life: How San Diego funds transportation with self-help tax measures
This is Part 1 of a series of blog posts from Circulate San Diego about a potential 2016 Quality of Life measure.
The San Diego region already passed two tax measures to fund transportation and other expenditures. The first measure was titled “TrasNet,” and it was adopted in 1988. It included a half cent region-wide sales tax and provisions for a variety of projects that the tax measure would fund. The second measure was called the “TransNet Extension,” and it extended the original measure for 40 years, and it amended the list of projects to be completed. Around the office at Circulate San Diego, we like to call 1998’s TransNet as “TransNet 1.0,” and the 2004 Extension as “TransNet 2.0.”There has been some talk about renaming a future tax measure often called Quality of Life to “Forward San Diego,” or with some other catchy or descriptive title. Regardless of how it’s captioned on the ballot, it might be useful to think of a new region-wide revenue measure as “TransNet 3.0.”
Read more
